The Samplers in Reason need switchable time stretching, everything else is luxury... Or what do you really need that Abletons Sampler has? There's just so much that their sampler/simpler have. There's an envelope section, so you can slice loops and it will apply that envelope to every slice instead...

AzureEyes wrote: ↑

27 Jul 2018

No because people cry too much when Propellerhead add new Native Devices!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

That's pretty stupid. Why would people not want more toys to play around with?

I've been looking into abletons sampler/simpler and holy crap there's just so much functionality. The nnxt/nn19 don't even come close and the edit mode doesn't have much either. Grain sample manipulator is beast in it's own category but it still doesn't have a lot of the functions. Very excited to s...

Everyone always talks about audio interfaces being this holy grail of music production and how they'll make your sound so much clearer and how you need one to get the cleanest mixes and on and on. So I got an audient id14 and am using the headphone amp with the hd650s and there's absolutely no quali...

knowing propellerhead they'd just say 24bit is enough and you should rewire for 32bitdepth exporting or 64bitdepth. That's a bummer. Sometimes I feel like switching daws because they ignore their fanbase. I bet you they wouldn't have allowed VSTs if they didn't think it was a good business move.

So many are deleted or unavailable gawd damn son.

I'm not arguing that there aren't work arounds, I'm just saying 32 bit should be an option as it is with most daws. It has benefits. You missed my point. Exporting to 32bit is the workaround. Not hitting 0dB when sending to a mastering engineer is proper protocol. Otherwise there are no sonic (hear...

I'm not arguing that there aren't work arounds, I'm just saying 32 bit should be an option as it is with most daws. It has benefits. It has exactly ONE benefit. As for “why not”, it’s likely only because the Props tend to move slow and if anything they tend to advocate for features that cannot be a...

1) I'm sure having the conversion process not act like a limiter is a good thing. 2) If your mastering engineer ever has any problems, he can just turn it down and the peaks are still there, instead of contacting you to make a miniature change. That doesn't really make it superior. Not clipping you...

Yeah sure 1 and 2 are the same reason, but there's still context. It's a tedious job to have to make a tiny change, re export and send the file again. Why not just 32 bit? Who needs a converter to limit anyway and it's a one time implementation that will last for a very long time and will be compet...

1) I'm sure having the conversion process not act like a limiter is a good thing. 2) If your mastering engineer ever has any problems, he can just turn it down and the peaks are still there, instead of contacting you to make a miniature change. 1 & 2 are the same thing, right? Just another way to s...

Well 32 bit is still better, your point is that you can work around it. Nobody is arguing with you that you can't, but clearly 32 bit is still superior when exporting. Also the the music you listen to doesn't get pushed to freaking -4 RMS. I think you may be trying to correlate bit depth with loudn...

Just because you can work around it doesn't mean that it's useless and that it shouldn't be implemented. It is one feature that will please everybody and stay as the set standard for a very long time, I don't see why it shouldn't be implemented. I don’t see why it shouldn’t be implemented either, b...

Well you are saying that 24 bit is plenty. We still get good benefits for going to 32 bit so why is it not the standard? it makes sense. I could see the argument for 64 bit, but 32 bit still has good benefits. Propellerheads have a talented team, I'm sure they could do it in no time [emoji14] There...

So 32 bit is the recommended bit depth to export at by every mastering engineer, literally every DAW except Reason has it implemented, but you are going to go ahead and say "NO! You are all wrong, it's unnecessary and there are ways to work around it!"? Maybe the extra flexibility wouldn't be such ...

So 32 bit is the recommended bit depth to export at by every mastering engineer, literally every DAW except Reason has it implemented, but you are going to go ahead and say "NO! You are all wrong, it's unnecessary and there are ways to work around it!"? Maybe the extra flexibility wouldn't be such ...

It's not all about hearing. It's about quality, and yes your peaks getting chopped off like it's a limiter is audible (sometimes not very, but it's bad enough and we need a solution, which there is (32 bit depth export)). Also how can I compare 32 bit vs 24 bit if I only use reason and I can't expo...

The only way I’m aware of that 32 bits is “way better” is that you cannot clip (which is only better if you’re someone who pays no attention to levels). Even with the lowly 24 bit format you’ve probably got 8 more bits (48 dB) than you’ll every likely need. That translates into being able to lower ...

Jmax wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2018

16 sounds fine to me

I don't see how that's a good argument.

Quite surprised that reason doesn't have 32 bit depth exporting yet, it's pretty much the standard for most daws now and is way better than 24 bit. Haven't seen any threads on this, has Propellerhead mentioned anything about it? In what way would you say that “32 but is way better”? It is true that...

Quite surprised that reason doesn't have 32 bit depth exporting yet, it's pretty much the standard for most daws now and is way better than 24 bit.

Haven't seen any threads on this, has Propellerhead mentioned anything about it?

Sorry, posted in the wrong section.

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=7507891