That's crazy, why won't they support it??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Does Balance work with windows 10? Can't find drivers....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Marc64 wrote:Back to the tracking days for a while to get in toutch with the limitations

This is fantastic.

Well I still think it's a breach of copyright. Were I on a jury I would interpret it that way, but anyway...
This guy used the Apple audio converter: https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4129769?tstart=0

Convert for personal use, once you start to "Share" you are into a different ball game. Besides sharing without the samples leaves the receiver needing the original samples, exact folder names and sitting in the same directory on their machine plus each patch will need individual re-marriage to sam...

When Line 6 first announced they were providing access to a portion of their tone library, they also offered two ways to expand the selection of patches (which included guitar, bass, synth and vocal tones): If you used a Line 6 audio interface, you would have all of the licensed Pod Farm patches av...

Yeah it sucks... What a bummer of a situation.

I do a fair bit of video stuff. But for me video in Reason is far from a priority. I'm usually doing audio in Reason & exporting for use in a video editing suite where I'm adding video to it. If it was the other way around i.e. adding music to video, then a video player / timeline in Reason would b...

Even Sibelius has video syncing....

Wasn't there a survey by the Propellerheads about a possible video support? Anyway, A basic video support to see a video and doing music for the video would be cool. I could then add sound fx to some happenings in the video 100% preciesly. Audio features are important too, but the audio feature dem...

Video sync is an audio requirement if you want to mix audio for video or make music or sound design for video. Well, I guess you'd use a tool that's designed to do such things, instead of tacking on video to a music production tool. What like ProTools, Ableton Live, Cubase, Studio One, Digital Perf...

EnochLight wrote:I agree, it would be pretty bad ass. But in the grand scale of things we need in Reason, I'd put video support pretty far at the bottom. For me, anyway.

It's at the top for me.

Gorgon wrote:I'd rather stay focused on the audio, there's lots to improve in that department.

Video sync is an audio requirement if you want to mix audio for video or make music or sound design for video.

Yeah it's with vocals that it's the most problematic. Just won't sit right. Very hard to describe. WIll be too loud one second, adjust and it's too soft. This is exactly why you would use things like a compressor and/or a de-esser. That's with compressors on buddy... That's with constant adjustment...

Yeah it's with vocals that it's the most problematic. Just won't sit right. Very hard to describe. WIll be too loud one second, adjust and it's too soft. This is exactly why you would use things like a compressor and/or a de-esser. That's with compressors on buddy... That's with constant adjustment...

Right after I say that I want it :( The truth hurt I guess. It was not meant like that at all! Features that are aimed at noobs can also be used by pro's. :) What I mean to say is that it's basically a simpel "hardware" solution for something that can be done in the software itself in quite a simpl...

Did anyone load up the Reason file I uploaded btw?

Yeah it's with vocals that it's the most problematic. Just won't sit right. Very hard to describe. WIll be too loud one second, adjust and it's too soft. This is exactly why you would use things like a compressor and/or a de-esser. That's with compressors on buddy... That's with constant adjustment...

To be clear, the FIRST Reason file had midi triggered instruments, and a virtual amp - the virtual amp cancelled out the print of the guitar part though, interestingly. But the synths didn't. The snare (being triggered by midi) didn't, but the kick drum did null out. There are discrepancies between ...

man, 16 pages of this! and it's funny, the people that accuse Reason of being flawed are always the ones who are more hostile, or who dismiss legitimate suggestions. then they say they're "done here", over and over. and it's sad because I actually do hear a difference in the original files he poste...

Yeah it's with vocals that it's the most problematic. Just won't sit right. Very hard to describe. WIll be too loud one second, adjust and it's too soft. This is exactly why you would use things like a compressor and/or a de-esser. That's with compressors on buddy... That's with constant adjustment...

Regarding dynamics or pan laws or anything like that...are you talking just importing the vocal and doing absolutely nothing to it? I've had a similar feeling when importing a piano wav from FL Studio (using the Korg M1 vst) into Reason and at first I'm like, does this sound different. After a bit ...

man, 16 pages of this! and it's funny, the people that accuse Reason of being flawed are always the ones who are more hostile, or who dismiss legitimate suggestions. then they say they're "done here", over and over. and it's sad because I actually do hear a difference in the original files he poste...

Regarding dynamics or pan laws or anything like that...are you talking just importing the vocal and doing absolutely nothing to it? I've had a similar feeling when importing a piano wav from FL Studio (using the Korg M1 vst) into Reason and at first I'm like, does this sound different. After a bit ...

8cros wrote: They were manipulated with a view to highlight the snare drum and a few other sounds in the mix of the PT.
I have a project file to confirm my words.

For the last time, no they were not.