Enlightenspeed wrote: ↑

20 Mar 2024

What, as in no page at all?

Is the page different to this?

No, it is identical, ie., nothing but builds and some help links

If you go into the part of the site that has Build Jobs and Manage Products etc, then there is a bit in there for Manage Developers. IIRC this was where you could get this, by adding their details in. Not sure if this is still doable now. Cheers, B Nothing there these days other than the builds and...

Mataya wrote: ↑

20 Mar 2024

Would a Reason 11 Lite license help you?

M

Thanks for your generosity, but I use "Recon" for development (it is basically reason 12 lite anyway I think)
Murf

Hi All, I remember back in Reason 10 it was possible to get a Not for Resale (NFR) key for Reason to assist with testing. When the Reason+ subscription came out I inquired with RS about this and they said it was not possible. I can understand anyone's reluctance to divulge if they in fact pulled thi...

I really have to make sure my Mixer isn't crossing over too much with yours Selig. If you are going to do 8 sends I might drop that idea and go back to the original 2U design with 4 sends. Murf You don’t have to change anything, I’m without a coder at present so you won’t be seeing this from me unl...

Yes, the returns make sense, because they have a lower delay. The mixer input delay depends on the audio buffer settings. AFAIK. The returns don’t have any delay , there is delay on the channels intentionally. It’s not a limitation of the system, it’s an imposed limitation to mitigate runaway feedb...

As I see vetical space is the issue here. If it's not essential that every channel has 8 sends simultaneously it could perhaps be an idea to reduce the number of knobs to maybe 4 or 2 per channel and make those assignable to sets of sends, as an example if there are two groups it could be aux group...

I really like the idea of large vertical faders/meters. All I’m thinking now is physical position and features, and a way to differentiate from what is already available. And also what is actually wanted, of course, all crammed together in a way that is still comfortable and inviting. A tall order ...

I think it's an improvement. Now the knobs of the different sends and their corresponding return should get some colour coding. Maybe following a nice sunset theme of colours would work out nicely. Thanks I have been looking for something like that color picker! I have started on colors already but...

I didn't really look back in this topic until now and must admit I added nothing compared to the already posted screenshots, skimming though all pages I don't really understand how Murf went from his almost finished Mix88 to Mix82 design. All in all , I can't really relate to people asking for more...

Could you do cv for the volume? so it could be used as a vca. Yes CV on as much as I can fit on the back panel. Wooooaahh I am gonna have to reneg on this!!! No way in hell I am gonna fit a cv for every knob per channel on the back panel I can maybe do 6 per channel assuming I stick to 3U. So Bass,...

To be honest, it looks terrible to me. Sorry, but I would not buy it, even I like the idea of a new mixer. Thanks for being honest, but that is not how it is going to finally look :) Not the final colors Not the final Knobs Not the final buttons (by far) Not the final slider Not the final VU meters

Here is a quickly thrown together 3U version. I didnt put much effort in since it is probably gonna change so much anyway Mostly got rid of the smaller knobs and made a bit more room I will start on the signal routing now since all the UI elements I will need are there (except maybe PAN width knobs ...

Is it possible to make it into a modular system which connects to each other device without having to worry about cramming all needed features together? It seems your mockup would work fine but adding more would make it too small for the GUI. Maybe if it had several connecting devices that would wo...

crimsonwarlock wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2024

It seems to me that it is more about the wanted/needed functionality, so why try to cram it all into 2U?

Seems like a classic case of form over function.

maybe 3U, which is still less than 4U
I will try it

madwurmz wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2024

Here is a mockup I just made, to see if vertical aligning makes more room, but it's the same, too cramped. I replicated your button sizes, but they are honestly too small.

It looks great, but is just colorful re-arranged busy
Murf

Well done sir, though you never said anything bad to me, I think being able to admit your faults in a public forum is admirable.

I have been busy, but now so is the UI ... too busy Not even any room for a name or brand lol
.
.
.
.
Not the final colors
Not the final Knobs
Not the final buttons (by far)
Not the final slider
Not the final VU meters (maybe)

mimidancer wrote: ↑

12 Mar 2024

Could you do cv for the volume? so it could be used as a vca.

Yes CV on as much as I can fit on the back panel.

Anyway here is my final feature list for the next Mixer, I know it wont please everyone, but the things I have missed will be included in a subsequent project I promise. Tentative name: MIX82 Size: 4RU Channels: 8 RETURNS: 8 (!) Channel AUX: 8 (2 with pre-fader buttons) Channel level (+10dB max, not...

This is all personal taste/preference ofcourse, but I think that MIX88 works because it's much bigger and there's a clear line of knobs per channel. On a smaller device with a bunch of knobs bunched together, I think colour variation is much more desirable for readability. Any-who, happy to check i...

turn2on wrote: ↑

12 Mar 2024

Our RE:
MuRFA24 Multi Resonance Filter Array 24

_________
Our RE:
AniMuRFA - Multi Resonance Filter Array

I feel honoured!
Murf

I know it's probably all still just placeholder stuff but please keep some sort of visual difference for the knobs, like your previous mockup shown at top. It's so much easier to use than a bunch of knobs all looking the same (as your latest mockups are looking) Yeah they are pictures of the Mixer ...

Yes, the returns make sense, because they have a lower delay. The mixer input delay depends on the audio buffer settings. AFAIK. Eep... this might not be doable for 3rd party devs... everything is buffered from input to output for us, so if Reason's Mixers can do it with no latency it doesn't neces...

Oh never mind ... I worked it out
jbox.value_display with jbox.string
Murf.